Idiopathic scoliosis : etiology
The etiology of 80% of scoliosis is or are unknown.
However scoliosis known since 460 before Christ, describe by Hippocrate.
The other 20% have multiple etiologies with a majority of them really exceptional.
The most frequent of this 20% are well known and the real challenge is to find the adapted treatment for you depending your expectations.
However scoliosis known since 460 before Christ, describe by Hippocrate.
The other 20% have multiple etiologies with a majority of them really exceptional.
The most frequent of this 20% are well known and the real challenge is to find the adapted treatment for you depending your expectations.
The main well known risk of aggravation
The deformations provoke important disruption of the postural equilibrium having a high risk to quick mechanical aggravation and movement disruption, aggravating factor by itself.
A bad personal life hygiene as no regular physical exercises or bad professional ergonomic organization as repetitive solicitation of the back in bad positions.
For child the period of high velocity of the back growth are dangerous, mean approximatively before 6 years old and in between 9 years old and the end of the growth in height.
The evaluation of these factors is particularly complex, the two main reasons why: first the high numbers of those factors, second, nevertheless they are known, a lot of them have no scientific support. Consequently the specialist has to pay attention to all elements he can identify for each person .
Nobody can be defined by a couple of numbers and/or statistics with the risk to apply a recipe which is positive for a small numbers of person and questionable results for the others
A bad personal life hygiene as no regular physical exercises or bad professional ergonomic organization as repetitive solicitation of the back in bad positions.
For child the period of high velocity of the back growth are dangerous, mean approximatively before 6 years old and in between 9 years old and the end of the growth in height.
The evaluation of these factors is particularly complex, the two main reasons why: first the high numbers of those factors, second, nevertheless they are known, a lot of them have no scientific support. Consequently the specialist has to pay attention to all elements he can identify for each person .
Nobody can be defined by a couple of numbers and/or statistics with the risk to apply a recipe which is positive for a small numbers of person and questionable results for the others